Posts tagged dividend stock

Altria (MO) Dividend Stock Analysis


Altria Group, Inc. (MO), through its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, wine, and other tobacco products in the United States and internationally. The current state of the company was finalized after a 2007 and 2008 spin-off of Kraft Foods (KFT) and Philip Morris International (PM). Because these divisions accounted for over two-thirds of the company’s profit before the spin offs, the dividend payment had to be prorated for the legacy US tobacco business. As a result it appeared to be lower than before, while in reality an investor in Altria in early 2007 would have not only maintained but also increased their dividend income. If the dividend record of the old Altria was continued to these days, an investor would find out that the company has raised distributions for 43 consecutive years. This tobacco stock was the best performer in the S&P 500 for the 50-year period from 1957 to 2007.
Currently the company is trading at a low P/E of 13.60, yields 6.70% and has a dividend payout ratio of approximately 80%. The current annual dividend is $1.52/share, and has been raised twice this year. The company earned $1.54/share in 2009 and is expected to earn $1.90/share in 2010 and $2/share in 2011. Altria has a target dividend payout ratio of 80% of earnings per share. This means that the company can afford to pay a dividend of $1.60 by next year, and increase of about 5%. Since 2005, earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Altria Group have increased by 6% annually.

The economics of the tobacco business are really interesting. Most of the revenue generated from sales go to Federal and State governments, while the cost of the actual product is very small relative to its sales price. The demand is inelastic. When prices for products increase, the increase more than offsets the decrease in consumption caused by the price. This leads to increase in revenues for the cigarette manufacturer.

Supposedly even Warren Buffett liked the economics of the tobacco business in the 1980’s when he said: “I’ll tell you why I like the cigarette business. It costs a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It’s addictive. And there’s fantastic brand loyalty.” However the increased regulatory actions against tobacco companies have prevented him from investing in the industry since “investments in tobacco are fraught with questions that relate to societal attitudes and those of the present administration…I would not like to have a significant percentage of my net worth invested in tobacco businesses.”

The company is a dominant player in the US tobacco market, with a 50% market share in 2009. This mature market is in decline however, and as a result future growth in earnings per share could be difficult to materialize. They would likely come from efficiencies related to restructuring, such as the closure of its Cabarrus facility as well as the integration of smokeless tobacco company UST, which Altria acquired in 2008. Altria expects the UST acquisition to be accretive in 2010. Altria also expects to generate an estimated $300 million in UST integration cost savings by the end of 2011. Altria also expects to achieve approximately $290 million in additional cost savings by the end of 2011 for total anticipated cost reductions of $1.5 billion versus 2006. (Source)
The issues that prevent some investors from purchasing Altria stock are potential liabilities related to possible unfavorable judgments against the company. There were 129 cases pending against the company at the end of 2009 for example. Back in the late 1990’s for example the company’s stock price was hammered on fears that lawsuits could potentially wipeout Altria. In reality it is doubtful that the company would go under, since its tax revenues are needed to fill the empty state and local coffers.
Altria Group, Inc. also held a 27.3% economic and voting interest in SABMiller plc at December 31, 2009. The stake in the company was worth $12.70 billion at year end, which was higher than the 5 billion the investment is recorded on Altria’s books.

I view Altria as a hold if held on its own. If investors also own a share of Phillip Morris International (PM) for every share of Altria (MO) that they own, I would only then view Altria as a buy. Phillip Morris International (PM) owns the international operations of Altria and was spun off in 2008 as an independent company.

Full Disclosure: Long KFT, MO and PM

Relevant Articles:

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Three Reasons Why You Should Sell a Dividend Stock

Investors buy dividend stocks for the long term with a view to generate passive income that supplements their retirement or other income. Dividend stocks have the tendency to appreciate in value over the long term while providing dividend income to investors so as to support their personal finance goals. Recently we received an email from Eric J. Fox who describes why he likes to buy dividend paying stocks.

Play games on Finance Blog

Medtronic (MDT) Dividend Stock Analysis


Medtronic, Inc. (MDT) develops, manufactures, and sells device-based medical therapies worldwide. This dividend champion has raised distributions for 33 years in a row.

Over the past decade this dividend stock has produced a negative total return of 2.20% per year. The company was grossly overvalued in 2000, ending the year at a P/E of 68 which explains the poor returns over the past decade.

Earnings per share have increased by 14.10% per year since 2001. For FY 2011 analysts expect earnings to grow by 25.40% to $3.50, followed by an 8.60 % increase to $3.80 in FY 2012.

The annual dividend payment has increased by 17% per year since 2000, which was higher than the growth in earnings. The company has managed to achieve that by paying a higher portion of earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends. A 17% dividend growth translates in dividend payment doubling almost every 4 years on average. If we look at the company’s dividend history since 1977, the company has indeed managed to double quarterly dividend every 4 years on average.

The dividend payout ratio has increased from 24% in 2001 to 29% in 2010. Between 2002 and 2007 the company raised dividends at the pace of earnings growth, as evidenced by a stagnant payout ratio during the period. Since then however the company has started to raise dividends at a much higher rate, which indicates that there are high chances that investors could realize a high yield on cost in the future.


Returns on equity have remained above 19 for the majority of the past decade. Overall the ROE increased steadily over the past decade.

Overall Medtronic looks attractively valued at a P/E of 10.30, an adequately covered dividend and a yield of 2.80%. In comparison rival CR Bard (BCR) has a P/E of 16.00 and yields 0.90%, while rival Becton Dickinson (BDX) yields 2.10% and trades at a P/E of 13.80. While the stock has gone nowhere for one decade, the company has managed to more than triple earnings per share, which makes it a bargain at current prices. Many companies like Medtronic (MDT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Becton Dickinson (BDX) were overvalued in 2000, which explains why buy and hold dividend investing didn’t work as well over the past decade. If Medtronic’s earnings growth managed to be half as good as it were over the past decade, the stock could do well over the next decade.

Full Disclosure: Long JNJ and MDT

Relevant Articles:

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Aflac (AFL) Dividend Stock Analysis


Aflac Incorporated (AFL), through its subsidiary, American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac), provides supplemental health and life insurance. The company offers cancer plans, general medical indemnity plans, medical/sickness riders, care plans, living benefit life plans, ordinary life insurance plans, and annuities in Japan. This dividend aristocrat has raised dividends for 46 years in a row. The company most recently announced a 9.70% dividend increase to 34 cents/share.

Over the past decade, this dividend stock has delivered an annual total return of 8.10%.

At the same time the company has managed to increase earnings per share by 10.90% per year. In 2009, earnings per share increased by 21.70% to $3.19. Analysts are estimating FY 2010 and FY 2011 EPS to increase to $5.46 and $5.99 respectively. The company’s Japanese Operations, which contributed 75% of its revenues, are expected to post strong near term revenue increases due to distribution agreements with Japan Post. Introduction of new products should also add to increased revenues. The expectations for US revenues are for a slowdown in the near term due to challenging economic situation. The company’s investment portfolio is riskier than peers, as it includes bank hybrid bonds and sovereign debt issued by European companies and countries. The company’s strong cash position and ability to grow sales and earnings should be a stabilizing factor however, which could fuel future dividend growth.

Return on Equity has increased from 16% in 2000 to 20% in 2009. In addition to that this indicator has remained between 16 and 20 since 2004.

The annual dividend per share has increased by 23.30% annually over the past decade. A 23% increase in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling every 3 years on average. Sicne 1984 the company has managed to double dividends every four years on average.

The dividend payout ratio has almost tripled over the past decade, from 13.50% in 2000 to 35% in 2009. This is a direct result of the fact that dividends have been increasing much faster than earnings over the past decade.

Currently Aflac trades at a P/E of 12.60, yields 2.50% and has an adequately covered dividend payment. I would be adding to my position on dips below $48.

Full Disclosure: Long AFL

Relevant Articles:

- Dividend Investing Works in All Markets
- A dividend portfolio for the long-term
- Three Dividend Strategies to pick from
- Financial Stocks for Dividend Investors

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

When To Sell A Dividend Stock

As a long-term buy-and-hold investor, most of my evaluation efforts are aimed at determining when to buy a stock. Sometimes it is necessary to sell a stock and we need to be equally adept at identifying those times. I have stated on numerous occasions that I have one hard and fast sell rule for my individual dividend stocks: When an individual stock held as a dividend investment lowers its dividend, immediately sell it. However, there are other times it makes sense to sell. Consider these:



Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

UGI Corporation (UGI) Dividend Stock Analysis

UGI Corp. operates propane distribution, gas and electric utility, energy marketing and related businesses through subsidiaries. Linked here is a detailed analysis and commentary.



Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

8 Dividend Stock Delivering Good News

If you closely follow the daily financial news as presented by the mainstream media, it is easy become jaded and start believing that there isn’t any good news out there. Don’t be confused by the noise. There are still many great companies committed to generating superior returns and rewarding their shareholder by increasing cash dividends.



Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) Dividend Stock Analysis


Illinois Tool Works Inc. manufactures a range of industrial products and equipment worldwide. This dividend champion has raised dividends for 46 years in a row. The company most recently announced a 9.70% dividend increase to 34 cents/share.

Over the past decade, this dividend stock has delivered an annual total return of 5.70%.

At the same time the company has managed to increase earnings per share by 2.30% per year. In 2009, earnings per share declined by 36% due to weak revenues caused by the global recession. Analysts are estimating FY 2010 and FY 2011 EPS to increase to $3.05 and $3.60 respectively. The company derives over 57% of its revenues from international operations. In addition to that it is operating under eight segments: Industrial Packaging, Power Systems & Electronics, Transportation, Construction Products, Food Equipment, Decorative Surfaces, Polymers & Fluids and All Other.

Return on Equity has decreased from 19% in 2000 to 12% in 2009.

Dividends per share have increased by 14% annually over the past decade. A 14% increase in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling every 5 years on average. Since 1989 the company has indeed managed to raise dividends every 5 years on average.

The dividend payout ratio has more than doubled over the past decade, from 24% in 2000 to 64% in 2009. This is a direct result of the fact that dividends have been increasing much faster than earnings over the past decade.

Currently Illinois Tool Works trades at a P/E of 14.40, yields 2.70% and has an adequately covered dividend payment based off next year’s earnings. I would add to my position there subject to availability of funds in my portfolio.

Full Disclosure: Long ITW

Relevant Articles:

- Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Wal-Mart (WMT): A High Dividend Growth Stock
- Chubb Corporation (CB) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Family Dollar Stores (FDO) Dividend Stock Analysis…

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Will The Real Smart Money Please Stand Up?

Peter Cohan of DailyFinance asks, Hedge Funds Bet on Inflation, Institutions Bet on Deflation. Who’s Right?:

The smart money — by which I mean hedge funds and institutional investors — is placing its bets outside of the stock market. But the smart money isn’t by any means in agreement about the direction of those bets: Hedge funds are doubling down on big inflation down the road by buying gold. But institutions are buying corporate bonds — a wager on deflation, since bonds grow in value as prices and interest rates fall.

The only thing they do agree on is that neither group wants to invest in stocks. But should you follow them? And if so, which way?

Hedge fund honchos such as George Soros, Leon Cooperman, John Paulson and Erich Mindich are making big bets on gold because they see the specter of inflation ahead. Bloomberg reports that Mindich’s $13 billion Eton Park Capital Management bought 6.58 million shares of SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) — an exchange-traded fund that tracks the price of bullion. In that gold trade he joins Paulson — operator of a $31 billion fund — who personally made $3.7 billion in 2007 betting on the subprime mortgage meltdown.

Meanwhile, institutional investors who are tired of getting beaten up by their clients — who are themselves tired of paying big fees for weak performance — are starting to creep out a little further on the risk-return frontier from buying U.S. Treasury bonds to scarfing down blue-chip corporate bonds. According to Fortune, 10-year notes for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) yield 2.95%, a mere 0.43 percentage points more than comparable Treasurys.

Yet institutions are clamoring to buy them, and companies are happy to lock in the cheap capital. What strikes me as interesting is that institutions are willing to pour capital into those low-yielding bonds when J&J’s stock sports a much higher 3.69% dividend yield (dividend/stock price). This suggests that institutions are still too scared to buy stocks.

Common Stocks: The Bottom of the Liquidation Hierarchy

These times are heaven on earth for those in the bond trade. As PIMCO honcho William Gross told me in February 2009 — a few weeks before the S&P began its 49% rise from around 735 to its current 1,098 — we’re in an era where owning stocks is pointless. He made an interesting argument: With slow economic growth, it makes no sense to take the risk of being at the bottom of the so-called liquidation hierarchy.

When a company files for bankruptcy, its bank lenders get first dibs on the proceeds from selling the company’s assets. If there’s any cash left over, it goes to bondholders, then preferred stockholders, and last of all to the people who hold the company’s common stock. Gross argued that investors are better off buying bonds because with a reasonable risk of bankruptcy, such investors will be better off than stockholders.

This is a great argument — except for the fact that it has proven to be wrong recently. And the odds of companies going bankrupt seem to be diminishing. Corporate America is in a cash-hoarding mood, holding $1.84 trillion according to the Federal Reserve. And since these companies can now lock in extremely low long-term borrowing rates, their balance sheets have been buffed up even as their common equity is out of favor with investors.

Can They Both Be Right?

One thing seems to clear to me: The gold bugs and hedge funds betting on inflation and the institutions betting on deflation can’t both be right at the same time. It’s conceivable that the institutions could be correct in the short and medium term, while the gold bugs end up being right in the long term.

Let’s face it — those hedge fund guys are the smartest and richest in the investment universe. But all the statistical evidence I’ve seen says inflation is dead and is staying buried despite the 140% increase in the U.S. national debt since 2000 from $5 trillion to $12 trillion.

Maybe the hedge funds buying gold are momentum traders — in that case they’re buying because everyone else is buying, and they’re betting that they’ll be smart enough to get out before that buying turns to selling.

It does strike me as odd that institutions keep piling into corporate bonds, but fears of deflation persist and with so much cash at hand, default risk has fallen dramatically.

One thing I don’t like is how the article is slanted towards “hedge funds betting on inflation”. Sure, some top hedge funds have increased their holdings SPDR Gold shares, but others have been busy buying many other sectors. I spent my day going over what the top hedge funds have been buying and selling. I pay attention to major increases in positions, and it’s definitely not all about gold.

As I stated in my last comment, hedge funds tend to buy and sell often in a quarter, but they do hold core positions. James Altucher reports in the WSJ, What Funds That Bought POT Are Also Buying:

Potash (POT) is up a massive 30% today on the heels of a $38.56 billion unsolicited takeover bid from BHP Billiton. POT was listed in my top ten picks for 2010 at the beginning of this year. My quote from that article:

“People need to eat. Potash increases the yield of fertilizer. And in an overpopulated world with people moving into urban areas (less farmers feeding more mouths), demand will spike for whatever can increase that yield. Potash’s stock is closely correlated to prices of the product Potash.”

Some great value investors have been buying up shares of POT in the past quarter and its worth taking a look at other positions they’ve been buying:

Mohnish Pabrai, a known hedge fund manager who fashions himself after Warren Buffett (even his fund is structured legally the same way Buffett structured his partnership in the 50s and 60s) bought shares of POT in Q1. In the quarter ended 6/30 Pabrai’s biggest added position was to the “Canadian Berkshire,” Fairfax Financial (FRFHF).

Renassance Technologies, perhaps the most successful hedge fund ever, owned $44 million of POT stock as of their latest filing. Other holdings they increased this past filing include: Microsoft (MSFT), Medtronic (MDT), and BP (BP).

One fund I’ve never heard of, Mak Capital, not only added POT as a new position in Q1 but it became quickly their largest position in their $400 million in holdings. They are probably having a party today. Other top positions of Mak Capital include THQ (THQI) and Mosaic (MOS).

When a hedge fund adds to a position like POT, or makes it the top position, you have to assume they’ve done enormous digging. This, of course, is not always the case, but with successful funds it generally is. That’s why its worth checking out what other funds have been buying POT and the stocks they’ve been accumulating.

Unlike pension fund managers, hedge fund managers have skin in the game. They’re compensated on a 2% management fee and 20% performance fee and they are subject to a high water mark so if they lose big in a year, they have to recoup those losses before charging performance fees again.

Most hedge funds deliver leveraged beta, but the top hedge funds are worth tracking. They’re typically (but not always) way ahead of the retail and institutional funds. So when the WSJ reports that some big hedge funds have taken a liking to mortgage insurers in recent months, you should pay attention and ask yourself why.

Other big funds are paring back on stocks. Reuters reports that Harbinger’s Falcone trims stock holdings:


Hedge fund manager Philip Falcone slimmed his stock portfolio by eliminating at least a dozen names and dramatically paring his top holding, a new regulatory filing shows.

The New York-based hedge fund manager, who is staking his reputation on a big bet that he can build a high-speed wireless network, eliminated stocks like Clearwire Corp (CLWR.O). and Mercer International (MERC.O) in his Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I.

Falcone also pared back Citigroup (C.N), which had been his biggest holding with 70 million shares in the first quarter, and cut telecommunications company Sprint Nextel (S.N).

At the end of the second quarter, the filing shows that he owned only 35 million shares of Citi, which has been remaking itself since being rescued with $45 billion in government bailout money. He also reduced his stake in Sprint to 35 million shares from 49.6 million shares.

During the quarter, Falcone owned 16 million shares of Palm Inc, having first announced his purchase days before computer maker HP agreed to buy the personal digital assistant manufacturer.

Falcone, whose strong returns last year helped earn him a spot as one of the industry’s best-paid managers, also added 25.8 million shares of Spectrum Brands (SPB.N), known for selling everything from pet care products to small appliances like the George Foreman grill.

Recently he pledged 12.9 million of those shares as collateral for a $400 million loan he raised with the help of UBS.

Cameron International (CAM.N), a manufacturer of oil and gas pressure control equipment, including valves, wellheads, controls, chokes, blowout preventers, also appeared in Falcone’s portfolio with 7 million shares.

Many other hedge fund managers made bets on energy companies whose shares had been depressed after BP’s (BP.L) Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Falcone has been one of the hedge fund industry’s most closely watched managers since a savvy bet in 2007 that the U.S. housing market would collapse and that mining companies would gain, earned his investors a 116 percent return.

Since then, he has seen some ups and downs. His flagship fund was off roughly 10 percent through the middle of July of this year after having gained 46 percent in 2009. In 2008 he posted a 22 percent loss.

Money managers like Falcone who invest more than $100 million are required to file form 13-F within 45 days after the end of each quarter. The forms include only U.S.-listed equity securities and related derivatives. Bonds, other securities and short positions are typically not disclosed. Managers may also leave off U.S.-listed equities they own under certain circumstances or file some holdings on confidential filings.

For instance, in the case of Falcone, much of his funds’ more than $2 billion investment in a wireless telecom company called LightSquared is not reflected in 13-F filings.

Finally, Mr. Falcone isn’t the only one pairing down stocks. Zero Hedge posted an excellent interview with hedge fund manager Kyle Bass who was quoted as saying “I don’t know how I can be long stocks”.

You may recall Mr. Bass was quoted back in February in a Forbes article on The Global Debt Bomb:

Kyle Bass has bet the house against Japan–his own house, that is. The Dallas hedge fund manager (no relation to the famous Bass family of Fort Worth) is so convinced the Japanese government’s profligate spending will drive the nation to the brink of default that he financed his home with a five-year loan denominated in yen, which he hopes will be cheaper to pay back than dollars.

Through his hedge fund, Hayman Advisors, Bass has also bought $6 million worth of securities that will jump in value if interest rates on ten-year Japanese government bonds, currently a minuscule 1.3%, rise to something more like ten-year Treasuries in the U.S. (a recent 3.4%). A former Bear Stearns trader, Bass turned $110 million into $700 million by betting against subprime debt in 2006. “Japan is the most asymmetric opportunity I have ever seen,” he says, “way better than subprime.”

Bass could be wrong on Japan. The island nation (and the world’s second-largest economy) has defied skeptics for so long that experienced traders call betting against it “the widowmaker.” But he may be right on the bigger picture. If 2008 was the year of the subprime meltdown, 2010, he thinks, will be the year entire nations start going broke.

The world has issued so much debt in the past two years fighting the Great Recession that paying it all back is going to be hell–for Americans, along with everybody else. Taxes will have to rise around the globe, hobbling job growth and economic recovery. Traders like Bass could make a lot of money betting against sovereign debt the way they shorted subprime loans at the peak of the housing bubble.

So is Kyle Bass right? I think he’s wrong on stocks, as top hedge funds and banks’ prop desks continue to bid up risk assets, but he may be right on Japan, and his views on pensions are definitely worth listening to (watch both parts of interview below).

But before you actively short JGBs or the yen, remember Mr. Keynes’ famous quote: “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”. I’ve seen many “star” hedge fund managers succumb to the market because they were absolutely convinced they were right and the market was wrong. Unfortunately, no matter how “smart” the money is, the market always dictates the terms of the trade.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Cardinal Health (CAH) Dividend Stock Analysis


Cardinal Health, Inc. provides health care products and services primarily in the United States. The company is a member of the Dividend Achievers index and has raised dividends for 21 years in a row. The company last raised its dividend by 11% to 21.50 cents/share in May 2010.

Over the past decade this dividend stock has delivered a total return of 1.40% per year.

Earnings per share have increased by 7.90% per year over the past decade. Since 2004 however the company has delivered no growth in earnings. The earnings picture is expected to further deteriorate in FY 2010 and FY 2011, as earnings per share are expected to contract to $2.21 and $2.44 respectively. The reason for the decrease in earnings include CareFusion Corp’s (CFN) spinoff, decrease in drug volumes due to the recession and a shift of significant amount of the drug volumes to fee-for-service compensation by most drug makers. Longer term drug volumes would increase, as the population ages and as millions of baby boomers will need increased medical attention. With increased penetration of low priced generic drugs being available in the market, revenues could be further depressed. One positive of generic drugs is that margins are higher in comparison to branded drugs. The problem is that the prices of generic drugs are much lower than prices for branded drugs.

The annual dividend per share has increased by a staggering 31.80% over the past decade, which was several times faster than the growth in earnings. The disconnect between earnings and dividend growth came as a result of the increase in the dividend payout ratio. If the company manages to maintain earnings per share at $3, the dividend could increase by 10% annually over the next decade and would still be adequately covered. The company has managed to double dividends every three and a half years on average since 1988.

Since reaching its highs at 20% in 2003, the return on equity has declined steadily. Any earnings reinvested back into the business have not led to increase in net income and might have even led to losses, which could be one reason for the decline in returns since 2003.

The dividend payout ratio has increased from 3% in 2000 to 19% in 2009. As the company’s earnings have stagnated in recent years, and given management’s recent history of dividend increases, I expect the company to share a greater proportion of its profits with shareholders in the form of dividends.

Right now the company is trading at a P/E ratio of 17 and yields 2.40%, with an adequately covered dividend payment. I view the stock as a hold. Cardinal Health is a prime example why investors should not purchase stocks with long history dividend growth on autopilot without doing any research. While the company could expand its payout ratio for the next decade until it reaches danger territory at 50%, and yields on cost could grow to 5% or 6%, without the ability to grow earnings per share, future dividend growth will be limited.

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Dividend Stock Analysis


Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) provides technology-based outsourcing solutions to employers, and vehicle retailers and manufacturers. It operates in three segments: Employer Services, Professional Employer Organization Services, and Dealer Services. This dividend aristocrat has raised dividends for 35 consecutive years. Back in November 2009 Automatic Data Processing announced a 3% dividend increase.

Over the past decade this dividend stock has delivered an average total return of 1.20% annually. In 2007 ADP spun off its Brokerage Services business, distributing one share of Broadridge Financial (BR) common stock for every four shares of ADP common stock held by shareholders. The total returns calculation for ADP over the past decade includes this transaction.

The company has managed to deliver an 8.10% average annual increase in its EPS between 2000 and 2009. Analysts expect Automatic Data Processing to earn $2.40 share in FY 2010, followed by an increase to $2.55/share in FY 2011. While the employment picture is bleak in the US, it is improving. In addition to that, the market for payroll outsourcing for small and medium sized businesses could provide opportunities for growth, because of low penetration from outsourcers. The market for processing services that ADP specializes in is expected to grow at a pace of 5% per annum until 2013. The company’s venture in the business process outsourcing is a bold move, considering the intense competition in this market segment, which could add pressure to margins. The market for business process outsourcing is expected to grow by almost 7% per year by 2013. Overall there is a high barrier to entry in the payroll processing field, since a sizeable investment in infrastructure is needed to process millions of employees’ information. The big plus of this business is the recurring revenue stream and strong cash flow. ADP is a great proxy for exposure to the technology sector, since it has a proven business model, and it is less susceptible to technological obsolescence. As prices for technology products decrease, ADP can do its job cheaper, which helps profitability.

The Return on Equity has remained in a tight range between 17% and 26%. Rather than focus on absolute values for this indicator, I generally want to see at least a stable return on equity over time.

Annual dividends have increased by an average of 15.90% annually since 2000, which is higher than the growth in EPS. A 16 % growth in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling every four and a half years. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1974, Automatic Data Processing has indeed managed to double its dividend payment every four and a half years.

Over the past decade the dividend payout ratio has doubled to 50%. This is a direct result of the higher dividend growth in proportion to earnings growth. As the company matures, it has returned most of its earnings back to stockholders in the form of increased distributions and share buybacks. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings.


Currently Automatic Data Processing is attractively valued at 15.60 times earnings, yields 3.20% and has an adequately covered dividend payment. In comparison to its closest competitor Paychex (PAYX), which trades at a P/E of 20.40 and yields 4.60% with a dividend payout ratio of 94%. I view ADP as more attractively valued. I would be looking forward to adding to my position in Automatic Data Processing (ADP) on dips.

Full Disclosure: Long ADP

Relevant Articles:

- Paychex (PAYX) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Eight Companies Rewarding investors with higher dividend payments
- 14 Dividend Stocks with Dividend Growth Potential
- Dividend Investing Works in All Markets

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Chubb Corporation (CB) Dividend Stock Analysis


The Chubb Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty insurance to businesses and individuals. The company operates through three segments: Personal Insurance, Commercial Insurance, and Specialty Insurance. The company is member of the S&P Dividend Aristocrats index.Chubb has increased dividends for 45 years in a row. The company announced a 5.70% dividend increase in February 2010, plus a 14 million share repurchase initiative.

Over the past decade this dividend stock has delivered an average total return of 5.90% annually.


The company has managed to deliver a 13.30% average annual increase in its EPS between 2000 and 2009. Chubb is expected to earn $5.30 share in FY 2010, followed by $5.60/share in FY 2011.

The Return on Equity has remained around 15% for the latter part of the last decade, after falling to as low as 2% earlier. Rather than focus on absolute values for this indicator, I generally want to see at least a stable return on equity over time.
Annual dividends have increased by an average of 8.70 % annually since 2000, which is slower than the growth in EPS. The disparity is mostly due to a gradual decrease in the dividend payout ratio and the billions of dollars the insurer has spent on stock buybacks.A 9 % growth in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling almost every eight years. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1984, Chubb has actually managed to double its dividend payment every nine years on average.

The dividend payout ratio has been on the decline, and is still much lower than my 50% threshold. 2001 and 2002 stick as outliers, since earnings per share were lower on high underwriting combined ratios. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings.

Currently Chubb is trading at 9.20 times earnings, yields 3.10% and has an adequately covered dividend payment. In comparison rival Travelers Cos (TRV) trades at a P/E multiple of 8 and yields 2.90% , while Cincinnati Financial (CINF) trades at a P/E multiple of 9 and yields 5.90%. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) is also a competitor to Chubb(CB), although it trades at a P/E of 22, and does not pay a dividend. The company does spend a lot of its cash flow on stock buybacks, which could prove beneficial in the long run since it could provide above average dividend growth over time for the same effort. I like the company and its business model. Insurance companies like Chubb (CB) are a way for investors to fill in the need for exposure to the financial sector, after several high profile payers like Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) cut their distributions.I believe that the company is attractively valued at the moment; thus I would be looking forward to adding to my position in Chubb (CB).

Full Disclosure: Long CB

Relevant Articles:

- Six Significant Dividend Increases
- 14 Dividend Stocks with Dividend Growth Potential
- A dividend portfolio for the long-term
- Financial Stocks for Dividend Investors

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

10 Dividend Stocks Delivering A Quick Payback

Payback is the amount of time needed for an investment to earn its cost, undiscounted. For example, if you buy a dividend stock for $100 that pays a $5 annual dividend, the payback is 20 years (100/5). Though not very sophisticated, payback can still help you screen for good, solid dividend growth stocks. I learned this lesson the hard way…



Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Best 50 Canadian Dividend Stocks

A few weeks ago, I got a comments on our top 10 and top 20 Canadian dividend stocks articles. Cecil was asking to get the top 50 Canadian Dividend Stocks (it seems that you can never get enough of dividend stock picks ;-) ).

While I didn’t want to discuss about 50 dividend stocks, I was wondering how to pull an interesting list without containing too much junk stocks into it. This is how I came with a few parameters:

-All Canadian stocks (TSX & Venture)
-Common stock only (no prefs, etf’s, etc, etc)
-”Active stocks” (need some trading volume)
-No stocks under 1$
-Market cap 10M

.
.

So here is the list of the top 50 Canadian Dividend Stocks according to those parameters (please note that data is as of July 15th 2010):

If you want to look at their trading trend, you can try Trend Analysis, a free stock trend anaylis tool provided by INO.


Ticker Name INDUSTRY_SUBGROUP Price Dividend Yield Payout Ratio Ex-Dividend Date
WFC Wall Financial Corp Real Estate Oper/Develop 1.1 20 80.88 Unknown
SPB Superior Plus Corp Retail-Propane Distrib 5.11 12.27 216.98 7/28/2010
EAT Prime Restaurants Inc Retail-Restaurants 2.75 11.76 99.44 9/27/2010
PMT Perpetual Energy Inc Oil Comp-Explor&Prodtn 6.3 11.76 526.91 7/20/2010
BCI New Look Eyewear Inc Retail-Vision Serv Cntr 14.35 10.97 118.25 7/28/2010
IRG Imvescor Restaurant Group Inc Retail-Restaurants 5.39 10.91 89.62 08/11/2010
EIF Exchange Income Corp Diversified Operations 9.8 10.87 N/A Unknown
STB Student Transportation Inc Transport-Services 27.19 10.32 N/A Unknown
AD Alaris Royalty Corp Invest Mgmnt/Advis Serv 4.22 9.8 51.84 7/28/2010
MBT Manitoba Telecom Services Inc Telecom Services 12.75 9.56 161.79 9/13/2010
CWX CanWel Building Materials Group Ltd Distribution/Wholesale 9.3 9.48 107.05 9/27/2010
PBH Premium Brands Holdings Corp Food-Meat Products 12.68 9.22 109.7 9/28/2010
GCL Colabor Group Inc Distribution/Wholesale 1.07 9.02 104.88 9/28/2010
ATP Atlantic Power Corp Electric-Generation 8.45 8.63 N/A 7/28/2010
MKP MCAN Mortgage Corp Finance-Mtge Loan/Banker 34.5 8.15 83.19 9/13/2010
SIS Savaria Corp Medical Products 4.9 7.85 33.76 Unknown
CUP/U Caribbean Utilities Co Ltd Electric-Generation 14 7.81 98.7 Unknown
BNE Bonterra Energy Corp Oil Comp-Explor&Prodtn 37.94 7.65 147.11 Unknown
UVI Unilens Vision Inc Optical Supplies 10.2 7.49 N/A Unknown
AGF/B AGF Management Ltd Invest Mgmnt/Advis Serv 19.49 7.43 90.92 10/05/2010
CPG Crescent Point Energy Corp Oil Comp-Explor&Prodtn 8.81 7.28 N/A 7/28/2010
CVL Cervus Equipment Corp Retail-Gardening Prod 8.97 7.06 59.48 9/28/2010
ALA AltaGas Ltd Pipelines 8.52 6.79 120.05 7/22/2010
INE Innergex Renewable Energy Inc Energy-Alternate Sources 12.6 6.73 N/A Unknown
DAY Daylight Energy Ltd Oil Comp-Explor&Prodtn 11.5 6.7 N/A 7/28/2010
KMP Killam Properties Inc Real Estate Mgmnt/Servic 6.25 6.57 N/A Unknown
JEX Just Energy Exchange Corp Gas-Distribution 11.97 6.54 N/A Unknown
MLX Marsulex Inc Pollution Control 18 6.43 70.15 Unknown
RP Realex Properties Corp Real Estate Oper/Develop 33.75 6.4 294.32 Unknown
MKX MKS Inc E-Services/Consulting 35.14 6.06 48.06 Unknown
BDI Black Diamond Group Ltd Rental Auto/Equipment 13.77 6 67.74 7/28/2010
OLY Olympia Financial Group Inc Diversified Finan Serv 4.14 5.93 N/A 7/16/2010
AFN AG Growth International Inc Machinery-Farm 8.78 5.81 58.09 7/28/2010
FCR First Capital Realty Inc Real Estate Mgmnt/Servic 12.3 5.81 288.05 9/29/2010
AQN Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp Electric-Generation 16.82 5.8 24.93 9/27/2010
BEK/B Becker Milk Co Ltd Real Estate Mgmnt/Servic 3.4 5.79 29.57 Unknown
AER Groupe Aeroplan Inc Advertising Services 22.4 5.69 112 8/25/2010
CTU/A Le Chateau Inc Retail-Apparel/Shoe 31.18 5.69 57.19 7/28/2010
CEU Canadian Energy Services & Technology Corp Oil-Field Services 20.81 5.68 143.17 Unknown
PLZ Plazacorp Retail Properties Ltd Real Estate Oper/Develop 1.44 5.66 231.15 Unknown
CPX Capital Power Corp Electric-Generation 28.37 5.63 52.7 9/28/2010
BCE BCE Inc Telecom Services 38.65 5.58 74.18 09/09/2010
TA TransAlta Corp Electric-Integrated 11.4 5.57 129.83 09/01/2010
PTO Pareto Corp Commercial Services 19.05 5.56 0 9/28/2010
X TMX Group Inc Finance-Other Services 27.84 5.36 107.9 08/11/2010
IGM IGM Financial Inc Invest Mgmnt/Advis Serv 2.07 5.31 96.53 9/23/2010
GDL Goodfellow Inc Bldg Prod-Wood 24.46 5.26 45.96 7/28/2010
RUS Russel Metals Inc Steel-Producers 69.29 5.25 N/A 8/19/2010
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc Life/Health Insurance 11.97 5.18 146.59 8/23/2010
T/A TELUS Corp Telecom Services 6 5.07 60.22 09/08/2010

image credit

Related posts:

  1. Canadian Dividend Stocks – Ex-Dividend Date Back to work now! This is my very first day…
  2. Top Ten Canadian Dividend Stocks So my fellow Canadian stock pickers, are you wondering…
  3. Top 20 Canadian Dividend Stocks Now leaving the world of income trusts, we dig further…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Walgreen (WAG) Dividend Stock Analysis


Walgreen Co is the nation’s largest drugstore chain with fiscal 2008 sales of $59 billion. The company operates 6,902 drugstores in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The company is member of the S&P 500 and was a recent addition to the S&P Dividend Aristocrats index.Walgreen Co has paid dividends for more than 76 years and consistently increased payments to common shareholders every year for 35 years. On July 14, the company raised distributions by 27.30% to 17.50 cents/share.

Over the past decade this dividend stock has delivered a negative annual average total return of 1.10% to its shareholders. The stock is trading at the same levels it was changing hands a decade ago.


The company has managed to deliver an 11.50% average annual increase in its EPS between 2000 and 2009. Earnings per share are expected to increase to $2.14 in FY 2010, and $2.49 by FY 2011. Walgreens focuses on internal growth either through opening new stores or focusing on proper location of in store merchandise, growth of products offered and making its operations more efficient. Front-end growth could benefit from the rollout of store remodelings across a majority of stores, including new merchandising initiatives that could boost non-pharmacy sales. The company expects to slow down on the store openings from 4 to 4.50% to 2.50 to 3% of total number of stores. The company is experiencing strong growth in prescription sales, and its overall same store pharmacy sales are increasing. The reason for this is focus on internal processes and customer service. Technology investments have focused on boosting pharmacist efficiency and reducing distribution system costs, which could further facilitate growth. The acquisition of Duane Reade, which gave it access to New York city market added 257 stores to Walgreens. In addition to that, the acquisition is expected to save over one hundred million dollars over the next two to three years.


The Return on Equity has decreased over the past decade from 20.10% in 2000 to 14.70% in 2009. Rather than focus on absolute values for this indicator, I generally want to see at least a stable return on equity over time.


Annual dividends have increased by an average of 14.70 % annually since 2000, which is higher than the growth in EPS. The reason for this is that earnings per share hit a temporary setback in 2009. Once EPS resumes its upward trend, dividend growth should almost equal it over time.
A 15 % growth in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling every five years. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1972, Walgreen Co has actually managed to double its dividend payment every six years on average.


The dividend payout ratio has increased from a low of 13.60% in 2004 to 23.80% in 2009. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings. The low payout has enabled Walgreen to spend more on growing its business. As its markets become saturated I expect the company to increase its payout over time.


Currently Walgreen Co is trading at 14.10 times earnings and yields 2.40%. While the price earnings multiple and the dividend payout are attractive, the dividend yield is below my 2.50% entry criteria. By utilizing my dividend grouping strategy however I plan on initiating a partial position in this retailer as long as it yields 2%.

Full Disclosure: None

Relevant Articles:

- Family Dollar Stores (FDO) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Wal-Mart (WMT) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Supervalu (SVU) Dividend Stock Analysis
- Bad Start of the Week for Retail Investors

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Beware Dividend Reinvestment When Selling Stocks

It’s probably no surprise that in the last year I’ve been buying some blue chip companies with a solid history of dividends. Dividend investing is one of those long term investing strategies that has, for the most part, fallen out of favor after the fantastic dot-com craze, crash, and subsequent bull market that saw the Dow at 14,000 before it crashed to the mid-6000s in the depths of the economic panic. Throughout that time the Dividend Aristocrats, stocks that have paid and raised their dividend in 25 consecutive years, and the Dividend Champions, stocks that have paid a constant or rising dividend for 50 years, have maintained their dividend like clockwork.

Through dividend increases, many a billionaire’s fortune have been built (Warren Buffet’s annual dividend from his shares of Washington Post and Coca Cola exceed his investment).

I’ve purchased several dividend yield stocks with the purpose of building a nice dividend portfolio. One of the risks of doing so is that the underlying stock’s prospects could change and they could go from a nice stable stock, with a nice dividend yield, to a scary stock with a grim future, with a nice dividend yield. A prime case is that of BP, which at the time I owned them was offering a healthy 6% yield. If BP had not cut its dividend for the rest of the year, it would’ve paid out a 12% yield on its dividend.

What happens if you own a dividend stock through the ex-dividend date but sell it before the payout? You still receive the dividend, since you are the shareholder on record as of the official date.

What happens if you have your broker automatically reinvest your dividends? At TradeKing, and most other brokers, you will still receive shares of stock even though you no longer own the shares that gave you the dividend. This is expected because at ex-dividend, that’s what you elected. Unfortunately, there’s no automatic check as to whether you own the original stake (is it technically correct to call it reinvestment if you liquidated the original?) and, as it turns out, there’s no way to change it with 100% certainty.

I contacted TradeKing to try to get it changed and they said they would put forth a “best effort” but there is no guarantee I’ll receive cash instead of shares. The clearing firm has already been notified to reinvest the shares, which is why they can’t say for sure what will happen. In other words, they will try but no guarantees. With so much time between now and the payout date, I’m hoping I can get cash instead of shares and avoid paying $4.95 to liquidate them.

Beware Dividend Reinvestment When Selling Stocks from personal finance blog Bargaineering.com.


Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Will higher taxes bring dividend stocks down?


Back in 2003 the Bush administration cut the top rates on dividends and capital gains to 15%. After seven years the preferential treatment of investment income is set to expire. If congress doesn’t extend the tax cuts, the top rates on dividend income could increase to as much as 39%. This leaves many investors wondering whether dividend stocks will be negatively affected by the tax hike.

Since 2003 there has been great interest in dividend paying stocks. Many companies such as Yum Brands (YUM) initiated dividends for the first time ever, while companies like Microsoft (MSFT) paid onetime special dividend payments to shareholders. In addition to that several dividend focused exchange traded funds such as iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend index (DVY) and SPDR S&P Dividend (SDY) were formed, attracting millions in assets under management. In addition to that many long time dividend payers such as PepsiCo (PEP) started increasing distributions at a higher pace than before, which further benefited their shareholders.

As a result, some dividend investors are concerned that the increase of tax rates on dividends will negatively affect payouts, which would negatively affect dividend stock prices for the next few years. In general the future tax rates on investment income for 2011 and beyond are still not set in stone by Congress, which makes most assumptions on taxation of dividends or capital gains pure speculation. It is possible that the top rate on dividend income could only increase to 23.60%, as 20% was the highest tax on dividend income for which Obama campaigned in 2008, while the 3.60% comes as the extra tax for high income earners which generate investment income.

So should dividend investors worry about the potential increase in taxes on dividend income? The answer is that it depends. While some companies might cut dividends as a result of the tax hike, many dividend payers would keep following a strategy of regularly raising distributions, provided that these companies can generate enough in free cash flow. Most dividend growth investors would not be affected by much, particularly since most dividend achievers and dividend aristocrats have increased distributions for over 10 and 25 years, which was before the Bush tax cuts were initiated. The companies that are less likely to cut distributions than grow them include:

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) engages in the research and development, manufacture, and sale of various products in the health care field worldwide.Johnson & Johnson is a major component of the S&P 500, Dow Industrials and the Dividend Aristocrats Indexes. One of the company’s largest shareholders includes Warren Buffett. JNJ has been consistently increasing its dividends for 48 consecutive years.(analysis)

McDonald’s Corporation (MCD), together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates McDonald’s restaurants in the food service industry worldwide. The company is also a dividend aristocrat, which has been consistently increasing its dividends for 33 consecutive years. (analysis)

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G), together with its subsidiaries, provides branded consumer goods products worldwide. The company operates in three global business units (GBU): Beauty, Health and Well-Being, and Household Care. Procter & Gamble is a dividend aristocrat as well as a component of the S&P 500 index. One of its most prominent investors includes the legendary Warren Buffett. Procter & Gamble has been increasing its dividends for the past 54 consecutive years. (analysis)

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT)operates retail stores in various formats worldwide. The company is member of the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrials Average and the S&P Dividend Aristocrats indexes. Wal-Mart Stores has consistently increased dividends every year for 36 years. (analysis)

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) manufactures, distributes, and markets nonalcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups worldwide. The company is member of the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrials and the S&P Dividend Aristocrats indexes. Coca-Cola has paid uninterrupted dividends on its common stock since 1893 and increased payments to common shareholders every year for 48 years. (analysis)

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) engages in the exploration, production, transportation, and sale of crude oil and natural gas. The company is a component of the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrials and the Dividend Aristocrats indexes. Exxon Mobil has been consistently increasing its dividends for 28 years in a row, and has paid dividends for over one hundred years. (analysis)

In addition to that, investors could avoid paying taxes on dividend income by investing through tax-deferred accounts such as the ROTH IRA. There is a contribution limit of $5000 for taxpayers, and there is also an additional catch up contribution for taxpayers over the age of 50. Those contributions should come from earned income (such as employee income) and are phased out for high income individuals. While a ROTH IRA would not generate any tax savings today, any money put in it compound tax free forever, there are no required minimum distributions and any distributions from it are tax free.

Furthermore I doubt that quality dividend stocks such as the dividend achievers or dividend aristocrats would be affected much even if tax rates increase, because not every individual would pay top rates on dividend income. In addition to that dividend returns are much less volatile than stock price returns, which is the reason why retirees prefer dividend stocks in retirement. Focusing too much on just one aspect of the investment process could lead to subpar returns over time. Many investors who wait for a few months longer before they sold their stock in order to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment could see their paper gains evaporate and turn into massive losses. This is just one reason why focusing just on tax rates while ignoring business or market fundamentals of the companies one is invested in is a dangerous exercise.

Full Disclosure: Long all stocks mentioned except MSFT

Relevant Articles:

- The case for dividend investing in retirement
- Capital gains for dividend investors
- Dividend ETF or Dividend Stocks?
- Why Dividend Growth Stocks Rock?

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

Family Dollar Stores (FDO) Dividend Stock Analysis


(NEED TO ADD QUALITATIVE DATA)

Family Dollar Stores, Inc.(FDO) operates a chain of self-service retail discount stores for low to lower-middle income consumers in the United States. The company is a member of the S&P Dividend Aristocrats index, after raising distributions for 34 consecutive years.

Over the past 10 years this dividend stock has delivered an annual average total return of 9 % to its shareholders. After peaking at 44 in late 2003, the stock fell all the way down to 15 in 2007, before recovering all the way to 40.

At the same time company has managed to deliver an impressive 8.40% average annual increase in its EPS over the past nine years. Analysts expect EPS to increase to $2.60 in FY 2010, followed by an increase to $2.95 in FY 2011. Increases in sales will be driven by expanding the current store count by 2%, as well as increasing same store sales as price conscious consumers purchase the company’s value-priced assortment of everyday necessities.
The once cash-only stores now accept PIN-based debit card payments in most locations. Food stamp and credit card acceptance is also being rolled out.
The company has benefited from the recent financial crisis, as some middle-class consumers have traded down to its store locations for everyday items. Family Dollar also drives traffic through limited time offerings as well as stocking up on treasure hunt items which creates customer excitement.

The ROE has been hovering in the 18% – 21 % range over the past 10 years, with the exception of a brief dip in 2005 and 2006.

Annual dividend payments have increased over the past 10 years by an average of 10.10% annually, which is higher than the growth in EPS. A 10% growth in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling almost every seven years. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1976, FDO has actually managed to double its dividend payments every five years.

The dividend payout ratio expanded slightly over the past decade but remained under 30% throughout the period. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings.

FDO is attractively valued with its low price/earnings multiple of 16.30. The current dividend yield of 1.60% however is low for my taste. I would consider adding a partial position on dips below $31.

Disclosure: Long FDO

Relevant Articles:

- Wal-Mart (WMT) Dividend Stock Analysis

- A dividend portfolio for the long-term

- Three Dividend Strategies to pick from

- Busy week for dividend increases

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

McDonald’s Corporation (MCD), a must own dividend stock


McDonald’s Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates McDonald’s restaurants in the food service industry worldwide. The company’s share of the US fast food market is several times larger than its closest competitors, Burger King (BKC) and Wendy’s (WEN).

McDonald’s is a major component of the S&P 500 and Dow Industrials indexes. The company is also a dividend aristocrat, which has been consistently increasing its dividends for 33 consecutive years. McDonald’s is one of the world’s most recognizable brands. Because of this and because it has performed very well to stockholders over the years, it is one of the most widely held income stocks by dividend investors.
Over the past decade this dividend stock has delivered an annual average total return of 8.70% to its shareholders.

At the same time company has managed to deliver an impressive 12.20% average annual increase in its EPS since 2000. Analysts are expecting MCD to grow EPS to $4.49 by 2010 and $4.87 in 2011.. The economic slowdown is making consumers to trade down and dine out at fast food places like the ones owned by the Golden Arches. Mcdonald’s has been focusing more on expanding the sales of existing restaurants since 2003 versus relying on new stores to be the driver for growth. Same store sales and profits have been driven by product innovation, and comparable-store sales growth, and are part of the company’s recent success. The constant innovations in the menu are indeed fueling strong same store sales volumes. The McCafe Offerings, in addition to the Dollar Breakfast Menu and Restaurant remodeling are further fuelling the growth in sales.

International operations, which accounted for almost half of operating profits in 2008, have been a major growth factor over the past two decades. This however exposes the company to fluctuations in exchange rates, which could add or detract from EPS performance. MCD’s stated operating priorities include fixing operating inadequacies in existing restaurants; taking a more integrated and focused approach to growth, with an emphasis on increasing sales, margins and returns in existing restaurants; and ensuring the correct operating structure and resources, aligned behind focusing priorities that create benefits for its customers and restaurants.

The ROE has been increasing since it hit a low of 14 in 2002. Recently it hit 30%, and has stayed above that level for two consecutive years.

Annual dividend payments have increased by an average of 28.20% annually since 2000, which is almost two and a half times higher than the growth in EPS.

A 28 % growth in dividends translates into the dividend payment doubling almost every two and a half years. Since 1979 McDonald’s has actually managed to double its dividend payment almost every four and a half years on average. Future dividend payments would likely grow at 10% for the foreseeable future.
The dividend payout ratio has steadily increased over the past decade, due to the fact the dividend growth was much faster than earnings growth. Currently the payout is at 50% . A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings. The slow growth in earnings could put future dividend increases at risk.

McDonald’s is currently attractively valued. The stock trades at a P/E of 16.50, yields 3.10% and has an adequately covered dividend payment. The company has proven to be somewhat recession resistant. I would be a buyer of MCD at current prices.
Full Disclosure: Long MCD
Relevant Articles:

Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog

TSX 60 Ex-Dividend Date, Dividend Yield, and YTD

We are July already! The month of June was quite rough on the market and on the TSX 60. I guess it could be a good timing for dividend stock shopping!

We are currently finishing our Market review for the month of June along with our dividend stock review. They will be both available in our next newsletter (to be sent next week). Make sure to register (in the right column) if you want to receive update on the market and dividend stock review.

Here are the Ex-Dividend date, dividend yield and ytd of the TSX as of this morning :


Ticker Name Price Dividend Yield Return MTD
YLO-U Yellow Pages Income Fund 5.94 13.47 -3.33
ERF-U Enerplus Resources Fund 22.94 9.42 -0.52
PWT-U Penn West Energy Trust 20.51 8.78 0.38
COS-U Canadian Oil Sands Trust 26.8 7.46 -4.11
AET-U ARC Energy Trust 19.99 6 -4.34
TA TransAlta Corp 19.74 5.88 -5.14
BCE BCE Inc 31 5.61 -0.94
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce/Canada 66.05 5.27 -7.92
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc 28.17 5.11 -8.54
T TELUS Corp 40.47 4.94 3.64
BMO Bank of Montreal 57.87 4.84 -8.36
HSE Husky Energy Inc 25.54 4.7 -2.22
POW Power Corp of Canada/Canada 25.51 4.55 -5.58
NA National Bank of Canada 55 4.51 -3.79
SJR/B Shaw Communications Inc 19.57 4.5 1.67
TRP TransCanada Corp 35.93 4.45 3.43
FTS Fortis Inc/Canada 27.16 4.12 -1.67
BNS Bank of Nova Scotia 48.35 4.05 -3.9
RY Royal Bank of Canada 50.91 3.93 -7.57
RCI/B Rogers Communications Inc 34.74 3.68 -5.57
TD Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 68.51 3.56 -3.25
ENB Enbridge Inc 49.47 3.44 3.19
MFC Manulife Financial Corp 15.41 3.37 -13.57
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp 38.34 3.13 2.93
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc 27.46 2.91 -4.97
SC Shoppers Drug Mart Corp 33 2.73 -7.51
ECA EnCana Corp 32.45 2.56 -3.7
BAM/A Brookfield Asset Management Inc 23.46 2.34 -7.09
L Loblaw Cos Ltd 38.51 2.18 -1.04
BBD/B Bombardier Inc 4.99 2 3.31
WN George Weston Ltd 72.1 2 -2.97
BVF Biovail Corp 20.02 1.99 30.25
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd 56.75 1.9 -1.99
FM First Quantum Minerals Ltd 54.22 1.89 -2.92
SAP Saputo Inc 30.69 1.89 4.53
CNR Canadian National Railway Co 60.56 1.78 -0.53
MRU/A Metro Inc 41.9 1.62 -1.87
SNC SNC-Lavalin Group Inc 42.44 1.6 -7.8
TLM Talisman Energy Inc 16.06 1.56 -9.78
CTC/A Canadian Tire Corp Ltd 54.93 1.53 -5.99
THI Tim Hortons Inc 34.04 1.53 -1.45
SU Suncor Energy Inc 31.11 1.29 -5.76
TCK/B Teck Resources Ltd 31.61 1.27 -11.84
CCO Cameco Corp 22.35 1.25 -10.62
IMO Imperial Oil Ltd 38.73 1.14 -4.68
MG/A Magna International Inc 68.41 1.11 -4.8
NXY Nexen Inc 20.82 0.96 -9.47
ABX Barrick Gold Corp 45.95 0.91 2.52
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 34.94 0.86 -4.54
YRI Yamana Gold Inc 10.34 0.6 -8.93
K Kinross Gold Corp 17.3 0.59 -4.42
IMN Inmet Mining Corp 42.72 0.47 -14.9
POT Potash Corp of Saskatchewan Inc 90.91 0.47 -11.82
G Goldcorp Inc 43.95 0.42 -4.24
IMG IAMGOLD Corp 17.66 0.36 -1.45
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd 61.07 0.3 -1.9
ELD Eldorado Gold Corp 17.94 0.28 -0.55
AGU Agrium Inc 52.37 0.22 -8.67
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc 29.82 0 -5.66
RIM Research In Motion Ltd 51.11 0 -20.44

Related posts:

  1. TSX 60 Dividend Yield and Ex-Dividend Date for February After a bad month of January, it is now time…
  2. TSX 60 Dividend Date, Year to date yield and Best Canadian ETF’s Yeah I know, I am a bit slow today to…
  3. TSX60 Dividend Yield, Ex-Dividend Date, TSX Return It’s June already! So here’s the latest post about the…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


Go to Source

Play games on Finance Blog